Anyway Solutions: Documents




 
Certificate documents

 

Green Label

IQNet

ISO 9001



Guide documents

   

Introduction to the production of Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks (CSEB) using AnyWay Soil Block - New

ANSS and the environment

Guidelines to the construction using ANSS

Rural Transport Infrastructure and ANSS

Application Process of Stabilizing with ANSS English French

The environmental advantages of building with stabilized earth blocks using AnyWay’s products


Material safety data sheets

    ANSS

Soil Block

Soil Mortar

Soil Bond

Soil Plaster


Standard documents

   

South African Bureau of Standards for earth building system

INEA Approval Angola

ANE Approval Mozambique

AnyWay’s CSEB Standard


Research documents

The following are reports of some of the researches done in recent years:

Brazilian Research

Please contact us to receive to full version of the above reports.



Virginia Department of Transport – Report
Abstract

Many pavement subgrades in Virginia consist of wet, highly plastic clay or other troublesome soils. Such soils can be treated with traditional lime and cement stabilization methods. Alternatives, including lignosulfonates and polymers, are available, but their performance record is mixed and solid engineering data are lacking, which prevents reliable design. The goal of this research was to screen a suite of traditional and non-traditional stabilizers against three Virginia soils that have caused problems during construction or resulted in poor performance in service. The selected stabilizers were: quicklime, hydrated lime, pelletized lime, cement, lignosulfonate, synthetic polymer, magnesium chloride, and a proprietary cementitious stabilizer.

A laboratory procedure was developed and applied to three Virginia soils obtained from Northern Virginia, Staunton, and Lynchburg.

Key findings from the research include: (1) traditional lime and cement stabilizers were far more effective than liquid stabilizers (lignosulfonate, synthetic polymer, and magnesium chloride) in increasing strength; (2) the liquid stabilizers were ineffective on soils with a high moisture content; (3) the proprietary cementitious stabilizer was more effective in increasing strength than lime for all cases tested but not was not as effective as the cement stabilizer; (4) quicklime and hydrated lime increased the workability of the soils although they did not produce strengths comparable to cement; (5) the strength of soils stabilized with cement and the proprietary cementitious stabilizer can be estimated based on the water-amendment ratio of the mixture; and (6) the strength of soils stabilized with lime can be estimated based on a combination of the plasticity index and the water-amendment ratio of the mixture.

The benefits of subgrade stabilization are that it improves the strength, stiffness, and durability of soft subgrade soils. Such improvement allows a reduction in the required thickness of overlying pavement courses and/or an increase in pavement life. Quantifying the life cycle cost benefits requires performing pavement design studies based on anticipated traffic levels, desired serviceability, etc. The preferred design method would be a mechanistic design, which requires resilient modulus values for the stabilized subgrade and other pavement layers. Neither resilient modulus testing nor pavement design studies were included in the scope of the work for this project, but they should be included in subsequent phases.

back to list


CSIR Report on AnyWay’s RBI Grade 81 – English
Abstract

This report summarizes an evaluation of the performance of the RBI Grade 81 stabilizing product for use as e road construction stabilizer. The performance of the product was evaluated in terms of the proposed Agreement Certificate testing and includes properties such as the improvement in strength, durability and erodibility. The strength evaluations that were carried out were the Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) strength. The erosion evaluation was carried through a water jet erosion test. The performance of the product was tested at different application rates, namely 2, 4 and 6 percent of the dry weight of the Silbou building sand material. The laboratory results and the evaluation of the product are summarized in this report.

back to list


The use of RBI 81 for stabilization of clay soil for road pavements - Politecnico Di Bari, Italy – Italian
Abstract

The recovery of local materials of insufficient quality, finalized to the use in road circle, it shows a double value: economic and environmental. In fact, the use of available materials in the yard consents of to reduce the entity of the transport of material from the yards of loan and toward the sites of refusal, with evident advantages tied to the reduction of new sites. Nevertheless, the tendency to use such material finds notable difficulties since they don't obey to the technical prescriptions. Between the grounds that am a little used in the roads those clayey appear certainly; they are diffused in several regions of our Country. The present research reports on the initial phase of experimentation in progress in the Laboratory Tests and Materials of the DVT of the Polytechnic in Bari; the research has two objectives:

  • The evaluation of clay properties mixed with a new product, natural, ecological, denominated RBI-81;
  • The determination of the optimal dosage of the RBI-81 and his/her influence, together to the conditions of seasoning (time, contained of water, etc.), on the mechanical characteristics of the mixtures.

This study, therefore, has experimental theoretical character and is the first one effected in our Country on this new additive.

back to list


Brazil paper - effect of curing time
Abstract

This paper address the topic influence of curing time on the unconfined compression strength of three gneiss residual soils from the North Forrest of Minas Gerais, Brazil, after stabilization with the chemical additive called RB1 Grade 81. The soils group encompassed a mature residual soil, named soils 1 (pedologically classified as a Red- Yellow Latossol), and two young residual soils, named soils 2 and 3.

Additive contents used were as follows: 2%, 4% and 6% related to soils dry mass. Data analysis supported the following conclusions: (i) addition of 4% and 6% of RBI Grade 81 to the soils led to significant increases in their unconfined compression; (ii) at 7 days curing time the mixtures exhibited significant unconfined importance of this parameter on the mixtures stabilization process.

back to list

  Latest News